Formula one, in my opinion, is nothing more than hamsters running over wheels. It’s pointless and utter waste of time, money and talent. I can list at least 10 reasons why I still hate it. Go ahead and prove me wrong.
- It’s not sports: Don’t call a bunny-turtle race, a sport. You give the same car to all drivers, and then we’ll talk.
- It’s not a race: What kind of race needs one of its competitors to slow down due to team order? It’s like Yohan Blake asking Usain Bolt to a slowdown because Jamaica said so.
- Crashes: I was told spectacular crash will be spectacular to watch. Even I have informed movies like Death Race is inspired by races, including F1. If it is true, then it’s deplorable.
- It’s not exciting: Around six blokes always ahead of the game, the rest always behind. I take a nap, take a shower, grab a coffee and browse back to the channel – they will be still racing in the same race in the same position!
- It’s a pit race: By the sound of it, races are won in pit stops rather than tracks. It’s like cricket is won in dugout, not field.
- Expensive: Considering you’ll only see the start, finish and one glimpse per lap! Even 1$ is costly if the deal is to sit there and yawn.
- Technology: I was also told, money is being put into fair use of invention automobile industry. A $500mil a year for each team from last so many years, I had expected some alien car craft! They still breakdown at the signal.
- Rich-men sport: How easy is it makes an entry for a team? Suppose you do, how many years you need to compete to make a single point on board?
- Hype: F1 is nothing more than a Ponzi scheme of the sports world with blown up go-karting. People follow because it is uncool not to follow. It’s a fashion statement.
- F1 geeks: They irritate me every day with specifics of turbo engines, RPMs, cylinders and another part which never amused me!
This is part 2 of what I had written few years back.
Update 25/01 : Due to a lot of good friends of mine objected the wording of #3 on crashes being spectacular, I have reworded it to have less exaggeration. But content remains same. I cant believe you never heard about it. One example right away, this author explains the romance between danger and dependency of F1 revenue on it. He writes :
……No one, myself included, wants to see drivers die, but by eliminating the potential for death (as nearly as possible), the danger which led to the popularity of the sport is lost.
The remaining glamour, without the danger, is empty and superficial—glamour for glamour’s sake—an endless parade of celebrities shuffling up and down the pit lane and drivers throwing their cars into turns knowing the risks have been diminished should they get it wrong.
I still stick to all other points, unless convinced otherwise.